Press Releases
Back to index > |
Judge Rejects
Federal Law Defense Used by Banks: Bank of America Class Action
Suit Goes Back To State Court
LOS ANGELES, CA, July 26, 2004—A
decision by a federal court judge last week determined that a
class action lawsuit filed against Bank of America in April of
this year does not fall under federal jurisdiction but rather
belongs in state court. The lawsuit seeks injunctions to stop the
bank from charging paycheck cashing fees without notifying its
accountholders of potential adverse legal consequences.
Bank of America removed the case—which was originally filed in the
state court—to the federal court, contending that any action
brought against a national bank is “completely preempted” by
federal law. After both sides submitted briefs regarding the issue
of federal jurisdiction, the judge decided to return the case to
the state court.
“The bank believed there was a question as to whether or not
federal law bars lawsuits in California against banks for
violations of California state law,” explains Nick Roxborough,
managing partner of Roxborough, Pomerance & Nye LLP, who filed the
class action lawsuits and briefed the federal court. “Our suit
against Bank of America doesn’t focus on whether or not a bank has
the right to charge a cash cashing fee. But it does strongly
contend that a bank can’t do so without advising its clients of
the legal consequences, more specifically, that this practice may
subject employers to liability of certain provisions of the Labor
Code.”
The suit against Bank of America was filed in April on behalf of
California employers who believe the banks' fees have placed them
in violation of Section 212 of the California Labor Code, which
requires that paychecks ‘be negotiable and payable in cash, on
demand, without discount.’
“We are pleased the judge recognized that the federal courts do
not have jurisdiction over this matter, and that this is an issue
for California to decide,” adds Roxborough. “We view this decision
as a major victory in that it is a rejection of one of the bank’s
key arguments in this case—primarily, that they can do anything
they want in California because federal law protects them.”
Roxborough, Pomerance & Nye LLP (RPN) is a Los Angeles-based law
firm providing expert legal counsel and representation to the
business community. Established in 1996, the firm
offers a broad range of legal services in all facets of civil
litigation with its primary focus on business, insurance,
employment, and wage and hour litigation. It is the first law firm in
the country to specialize in and make new law when representing
employers in workers’ compensation premium and dividend disputes
with insurance carriers.
^ TOP |